The punishment prescribed under Section 302 PPC reflects the seriousness with which the Pakistani legal system views intentional murder.
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon because of the prosecution against the petitioner and his higher than mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined via the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated 2-12-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
Being a society, it is actually essential to carry on striving for your just legal system that makes sure fairness, protection, and regard for all individuals’ right to life.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Provided the legal analysis on the topic issue, we're from the view that the claim in the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle will not be legally audio, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, These are matter to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case on the petitioners for promotion may very well be regarded as, however, we have been obvious inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded as for seniority and promotion as being the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Physical fitness, issue to availability of vacancy topic for the approval in the competent authority.
3. I have listened to the realized counsel for the parties and have absent through the record of this case with their able assistance.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, It is additionally a perfectly-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is issue towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.
Allow’s target what the Prosecution must prove in order to gain a conviction. There are four elements that must be proven.
There are countless circumstances where death was never supposed – even more where Those people nominated in the FIR were not present when the injury or death occurred. The death of a human being is often a tragic event. Though the death of any living being is no considerably less a tragic event.
thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that the moment the act of misconduct is recognized and also the employee is found guilty after owing process of regulation, it is the prerogative with the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, from the different penalties provided in regulation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that read more the penalty imposed just isn't proportionate with the seriousness with the act of misconduct just isn't suitable even so the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion inside of a structured and lawful manner. Read more
When the petitioner is solely present for the place of incidence without causing any injury for the deceased or PWs then in this sort of circumstances, whether he is vicariously liable shall be decided via the figured out trial Court after recording with the evidence.
Criminal cases In the common law tradition, courts decide the legislation applicable into a case by interpreting statutes and making use of precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Contrary to most civil law systems, common regulation systems Adhere to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their have previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lower courts should make decisions steady with the previous decisions of higher courts.
This article delves into the intricacies of the recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case law, to offer a comprehensive understanding of its implications and practical applications.
In case the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is often only accomplished Should the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence plus the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as such they were effectively conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to get looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year outdated boy from his home to protect him from the horrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced endured in his home, and to prevent him from abusing other children from the home. The boy was placed in an crisis foster home, and was later shifted all-around within the foster care system.